The White River Township Planning Commission held a Special Meeting on December 2, 2025, where the focus was primarily on the Lakeside Solar Project, proposed by Geronimo Power. The meeting, which began with formalities such as the approval of the agenda and meeting minutes, provided a overview of the project’s current status and addressed ongoing concerns.

Planning Commission’s Statement
Before delving into old business, Planning Commission Chair Lauren Wackernagel read a statement regarding the Commission’s follow-up process with the applicant. She explained that the Commission had submitted a second set of questions to Geronimo Power on November 21st, but only received a response that afternoon, which did not fully address the questions. The applicant requested the removal of duplicate questions and categorization, but the Commission found many of the answers unsatisfactory.
Wackernagel noted that despite the applicant’s claims of acting in good faith, the majority of responses were overly general and failed to provide the detailed, technical information necessary for the Planning Commission to make an informed decision. She emphasized that the Commission is committed to completing its review within the statutory timeline but expressed concern that a significant portion of the timeline has already elapsed.
Update on Lakeside Solar Project
Leslie Zawada, from CES Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc., provided an update on the Special Land Use (SLU) Permit Application for Lakeside Solar. She summarized the applicant’s responses to follow-up questions posed by the Planning Commission, many of which indicated that the requested information was not required under Act 233, the state law governing solar projects. Zawada highlighted areas where additional information was still needed, especially concerning the environmental and structural impacts of the solar arrays.
Zawada’s presentation also addressed some of the deficiencies identified in the application, particularly in relation to the Township’s Renewable Energy Ordinance. These deficiencies were noted as significant, as they relate to the mandatory requirements under both the Township’s ordinance and Act 233. The Planning Commission expressed frustration with the applicant’s tendency to respond with generic statements, such as citing that certain details were not required by law, rather than providing the necessary technical information.
Community Input and Expert Reviews
The meeting also included presentations from local experts who reviewed specific aspects of the project. Dave Francis, of Montage Tree Farm, provided feedback on the vegetative screening plans, suggesting that a more diverse selection of plant species be considered to enhance the visual appeal and sustainability of the project. Francis also raised concerns about the proposed use of grazing animals for vegetation management, noting that it could negatively affect plant health during the early establishment phase.
Connie Crancer, an expert in vegetative management, also offered her insights, pointing out areas where the proposed plan could be improved to meet best management practices. She emphasized the need for a more comprehensive approach to site preparation, planting methods, and long-term monitoring to ensure the project’s sustainability.
Next Steps and Future Meetings
The Planning Commission reiterated its commitment to performing due diligence and ensuring the project complies with all regulations. The Commission is scheduled to hear further presentations from subject matter experts and review detailed reports during the regular meeting on December 16, 2025.
Public Comments
During the meeting, several residents voiced their concerns, particularly about the transparency of the applicant’s responses. Many praised the Planning Commission for their diligent efforts to review the project thoroughly. Concerns were raised about the potential impact on local land use, environmental effects, and the long-term sustainability of the project.
White River Township Planning Commission Meeting Recap
Stay connected to what’s happening in our area by visiting CatchMark Community.
Powered by CatchMark Technologies — helping people, solving problems. Explore more on our website.
Amy Yonkman is the Product Lead for the CatchMark Community platform, bringing extensive experience in project management, WordPress administration, and digital content creation. She excels at coordinating projects, supporting cross-functional teams, and delivering engaging digital experiences. Amy is skilled in content strategy, workflow optimization, and multimedia editing across web and social platforms. With a strong background in task organization, technical writing, and customer service, she plays a key role in driving the growth and impact of CatchMark’s community-focused digital initiatives.
Must See
-
History
/ 18 minutes agoWhitehall Rises: The Making of a Lakeside City
In this week’s Trivia Tuesday, we asked: When did Whitehall officially become a city?...
By Amy Yonkman -
Community
/ 3 hours agoHunters and Anglers: Ice Fishing Safety Tips for 2025
As winter settles in and temperatures drop, many anglers look forward to heading out...
By Amy Yonkman -
Community
/ 1 day agoWhite Lake History – Church’s In White Lake
Early Congregations Build the Foundation White Lake grew fast in the late 1800s, and...
By Owen Raeth